NURS FPX 8004 Assessment 1 Professional Practice Report
Student name
Capella University
NURS- FPX8004
Professor Name
Submission Date
Section I: Application of the MEAL Plan
As pressure in the arteries that move the blood from the heart to the lungs rises, the blood is not able to flow through them, and they cannot be as effective at delivering oxygen to the body—this is called pulmonary hypertension (PH) and can also result in poor health outcomes. (E) This condition can be associated with a number of underlying disorders, including conditions affecting the lungs, heart, and liver, and is associated with connective tissue disorders and some chronic infections. While the PH can happen to people of all ages more often seen in people with autoimmune diseases, those living at high altitudes, and those with congenital heart problems. While still hard to detect early, better management is difficult, but reducing the susceptibility by modifying other risk factors, such as systemic hypertension, chronic respiratory diseases, and smoking, is possible. There is no cure; the treatment consists of treating the symptoms with pharmacologic treatments, supplemental oxygen and diuretics. The level of public awareness and understanding, early diagnosis, and specific management strategies will be essential to improving the outcomes and Quality of Life of individuals with the PH issue.
Summary of Scholarly Source
The PH is serious and may be life threatening, and intensive clinical management and monitoring are needed. Despite the effectiveness of treatments, the results have been less than optimal, particularly when PH is associated with other chronic conditions. Klinger et al. (2023) carried out a retrospective cohort study to understand the clinical and economic impact of PH in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) between 2016 and 2021 from the Optum® Clinformatics® Data Mart. PH-COPD patients were matched with COPD patients who did not have PH, and a total of 1,627 patients were included in the study. The results revealed a significant increase in exacerbation rates (in terms of either the number or severity of exacerbations) and a reduced time to first exacerbation in the persons with PH-COPD. In addition, the rate of hospitalizations and outpatient use, as well as emergency department (ED) visits, were all higher. Besides, the disease was also an economic burden since the health care costs associated with PH-COPD patients and with COPD itself were significantly higher when compared with patients without PH-COPD. This study showed the importance of PH in the clinical and economic burden of COPD patients and supported the fact that the population of patients with PH and COPD is a patient population with no specific treatment.
Section II: Practice Site and Problem
The practice is a cardiovascular/pulmonary specialty in the southern United States and is a large academic medical center. It has an intensive care unit (ICU) with high acuity care as well as outpatient clinics to treat complex conditions, such as pulmonary hypertension. There are advanced programs for cardiopulmonary diagnostics, pharmacologic therapy, and research to further improve patient outcomes. For patients with severe cardiopulmonary disease, such as those with pulmonary hypertension (PH), there is a correlation between better outcomes as patients, better care coordination, and better adherence to evidence-based guidelines for those receiving high acuity care in an intensive care unit (ICU) with outpatient specialist care (Espelta et al., 2023). The center serves a diverse population, including disadvantaged sectors, for whom access and receipt of medical care are fraught with a variety of problems. At the personal communication level, executive leadership confirms that the evidence-based care of physician, nurse, and respiratory therapy (RT) interdisciplinary teams is well supported, at which point right heart failure occurs, and pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a progressive condition that causes an increase in pulmonary artery pressure.
The problems in the ICU are exacerbated by those of critically ill patients. Currently, no uniform screening/testing method or treatment protocols have been established. There is a lack of understanding of PH among staff, and care is fragmented. The university is organized according to the layered management system, which can play a supporting role in collaboration between the disciplines, as well as continuous improvement of quality. Innovation, inclusiveness, and the use of evidence based practice are aimed at helping reduce the health care gap to facilitate health equity. In a health care system, the focus on quality is about the standardization of the taking of care processes and minimization of the risk of “iatrogenic” injuries.
Identification of the Problem
From the practice setting, patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and staff comments revealed the following issues related to a delay in the diagnosis and variable management of PH: (1) difficulties with recognition, (2) burden of the disease (physical and mental), and (3) issues related to treatment. During the period of January 2023 to March 2024, 39% of all the patients with PH were in the critically ill group, where the delay of diagnosis was more than 20% (it is important to note that this diagnostic delay is at least 2 times more than the international benchmark suggested by the American Thoracic Society in 2024). The data revealed that those diagnosed later were, on average, in the ICU for 9.2 days while those diagnosed timely were in the ICU for 5.6 days. Not having a standardized screening tool for the ICUs and not having a uniform application of evidence-based interventions were identified as a concern by the nursing staff (personal communication, Executive Nurse, 15th April 2026). The lack of practices is a significant missed opportunity to either timely identification of children at risk and/or proper treatment of children.
While multidisciplinary team management is encouraged in American Thoracic Society (ATS) and European Respiratory Society (ERS) guidelines, it is recognized that practices with such functionality aren’t necessarily in place (ATS, 2024). This is not an isolated problem, as the mean of less than 30% of patients arriving in an ICU with PH receive the correct treatment in the first 48 hours after the start of PH treatment (Zuin, 2024). A delay in diagnosis has been proven to have a negative impact on patients’ quality of life, prolong the length of stay, and cause a cost to the health care system. As the stays are lengthy, and often indefinite, in the presence of the patient and the family, along with the invasive, diagnosis disrupting nature of the process in general, the impact on the family is deep and distressing. Advanced, consistent outcomes and compliance with best practice standards should be the primary goals of an early diagnosis and interdisciplinary approach quality improvement program (QIP) to be implemented at the health care service. There will be standardized procedures in the first instance, and the program will take this form from there on.
Implications of the Problem
Under-recognition of PH in the severely ill patient has implications beyond the clinical arena. These entail impacts on the performance and economic interests of the institution, liability, and moral issues. Healthcare institutions must consider the implications if they realise that they have a poor delivery of healthcare services. Undetected and a lack of awareness of PH in some health care operating systems are contributing to increased health care use, decreased health care quality, and patient safety (Gillmeyer et al., 2025). The use of arbitrary treatment protocols and incorrect diagnosis impacts the length of stay in the ICU, and increases the number of intubations and ventilation, and the number of unplanned hospital re-admissions. These impacts are an enormous cost to the health system, the patient, and their families (Klinger et al., 2023). Further, Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement policies help to keep the programs fiscally neutral and provide quality patient results. Institutions can also be faced with lower reimbursement and financial penalties if they’re unable to deliver the care that is provided and required on time.
The clinical consequence of not identifying and treating pulmonary hypertension (PH) in a timely manner will be worse outcomes. No doubt, mortality can only rise as the diagnosis of PH is delayed, associated with right heart failure and respiratory distress (Zuin et al., 2024). Lack of a diagnostic protocol for treatment adds to the variability in clinical decision making. Some people might overlook the signs and symptoms of PH and may postpone beginning therapy. This split learning of care is bad, unsafe, and can reduce the effectiveness of the care given. Consistent use of well defined, evidence based protocols and guidelines will increase the early identification and care of PH, stop progression of the condition and/or complications, and ensure optimal care.
Regulatory requirements give added impetus to the standardization of practice. The American Thoracic Society (2024) has recommended the following evidence-based protocols to enhance the diagnosis and treatment standards in critical care. Time is of the essence in caring for patients, and the time to diagnosis and treatment of PH is an ethical matter. Not providing timely care is a violation of the ethical principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice (Elmer et al., 2025) and may lead to an avoidable malpractice action against the institution. Ethically, legally, and institutionally, the PH should be monitored periodically for optimal results for the patient and institution.
References
American Thoracic Society. (2024). Pulmonary vascular disease. Thoracic.org. https://www.thoracic.org/statements/pulmonary-vascular.php
DuBrock, H. M., Silvert, E., Doddahonnaiah, D., Murugadoss, K., Wagner, T., Lopez, D., & Sandros, M. (2025). Assessing the impact of time to diagnosis and treatment for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Pulmonary Circulation, 15(4), e70208. https://doi.org/10.1002/pul2.70208
Elmer, J., Atkins, D. L., Daya, M. R., Del Rios, M., Fry, J. T., Henderson, C. M., Newby, M., Madrigal, V. N., Marco, C. A., Ornato, J. P., Paquette, E. T., Parnia, S., Rodriguez, A. J., Shapiro, J. P., Schexnayder, S. M., Weiss, E. M., Zientek, D. M., & Idris, A. H. (2025). Part 3: Ethics: 2025 American Heart Association Guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation, 152(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1161/cir.0000000000001371
Espelta, E., Ferraté, M., Navarro, B. T., Curto-Romeu, C., Noll, J. L., Ariza, M. P., Blanco, E. C., & Ferré-Grau, C. (2023). Innovative health and social integrated care model effectiveness to improve quality care for chronic patients: A single-group assignment clinical trial. International Journal of Integrated Care, 23(4), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.6759
Gillmeyer, K. R., Shusterman, S., Rinne, S. T., Elwy, A. R., & Wiener, R. S. (2025). Gaps in access to pulmonary hypertension care and opportunities for improvement: A multi-site qualitative study. BioMed Central Pulmonary Medicine, 25(1), e355. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-025-03817-4
Klinger, J. R., Wu, B., Morland, K., Classi, P., Fiano, R., & Grabich, S. (2023). Burden of pulmonary hypertension due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Analysis of exacerbations and healthcare resource utilization in the United States. Respiratory Medicine, 219, e107412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2023.107412
Zuin, M., Bikdeli, B., Hernandez, J., Barco, S., Battinelli, E. M., Giannakoulas, G., Jimenez, D., Klok, F. A., Lang, I. M., Moores, L., Sylvester, K. W., Weitz, J. I., & Piazza, G. (2024). International clinical practice guideline recommendations for acute pulmonary embolism. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 84(16), 1561–1577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2024.07.044
FAQs
Q1: What is the purpose of the Professional Practice Report?
A: The report evaluates professional nursing practice, leadership abilities, and opportunities for continued professional growth.
Q2: Why is reflective practice important in nursing?
A: Reflective practice helps nurses assess experiences, improve clinical skills, and enhance patient care outcomes.
Q3: How does evidence-based practice support professional nursing?
A: Evidence-based practice ensures clinical decisions are supported by current research, improving patient safety and care quality.
