NURS FPX 8008 Assessment 3 Taking the Person-Centered Collaborative Care Intervention Forward
Student name
Capella University
NURS- FPX8008
Professor Name
Submission Date
Taking the Person-Centered Collaborative Care Intervention Forward
For any system to be successful in implementing person-centered care (PCC) initiatives to improve health care quality outcomes, advanced practice nurses (APRNs) emerge as key players. But some obstacles can hinder the transformation, such as the opposition of healthcare providers to the introduction of innovations, the lack of standard procedures, and the lack of involvement of patients in the process of care. Barriers in the project are addressed systematically in compliance with a change evidence-based framework, which allows the transition to PCC methodologies. The APRNs are able to utilize the strategic implementation and continuous evaluation as effective strategies to ensure optimal patient outcomes, complete care coordination, and retain a person-centered approach for optimal clinical practice. The evaluation is based on the implementation of the PCC intervention and a comparison of the results and the performance indicators.
Strategic Outline for the Person-Centered Care Intervention
Healthcare transformation needs to be done in a systematic way to bring sustainable change in the healthcare patient care delivery system. The intervention will leverage a full range of technology-based, patient-centred approaches with the plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycle as the basis. The planning process will require the team to identify specific problems, set measurable outcomes, generate hypotheses, and design interventions with specific statements of predictions regarding what is likely to happen. The do phase involves making the planned modification on a small scale (if applicable), collecting relevant information, and recording observations during the test phase. Throughout the study, teams will interpret the data they collect, compare the data to the predicted data, and report any unexpected data and the findings regarding whether the intervention provided hoped-for solutions. The act is based on the outcome of the study and the planning of the next PDSA cycle to be decided by adopting, adapting, or abandoning the tested change. Its iterative nature allows for ongoing learning, rapid reaction, and judgment-based problem-solving of outcomes in the healthcare improvement process, ensuring sustainable change.
Implementation Timeline
Implementing a project successfully requires that it be phased so that stakeholders can be engaged throughout the project and success can be achieved. Well-defined implementation timelines and planning for integration with the healthcare system, and preparing the necessary stakeholders, are critical to the success of healthcare interventions. The first phase (One to three months) focuses on engaging stakeholders, installing new digital infrastructure, and providing staff training on new digital platforms. Phase 2 (Months 4-9) emphasizes the pilot testing of services with targeted patient populations, the implementation of telehealth, and the launch of patient portal systems to enable services; and Phase 3 (Months 10-15) aims to spread the services organization-wide, incorporate the use of AI for coordinating care, and implement ongoing quality improvement processes. The focus of Phase 4 (Months 16-18) is on full-scale implementation, advanced analytics deployment, and full-scale outcome evaluation. The continuous process of strategic planning allows for each step to be a development based on the prior steps and remain patient-centred.
Expected Outcomes and Success Metrics
Any health care intervention or improvements in patient satisfaction should be able to be measured through benchmarks for the success of the intervention for quality improvement in health care. Primary key measures include: 85% of patients having accessed the patient portal, 40% of emergency department visits for non-emergent care, and 90% of patients being satisfied with digital health services. Secondary outcomes include 30% efficiency gain in care coordination, 25% reduced appointment no-show rates, and 95% provider satisfaction in implementing technology. There should be quantitative measures and qualitative feedback measures in comprehensive measurement strategies to reflect the impact of the intervention. To be evidence-based, healthcare delivery always requires a monitoring and adaptive response to adapt to new changes in the needs of patients. Delivered through clinical outcomes, these measures will provide evidence of increased adherence to medication, greater chronic disease management metrics, and increased patient self-management. Long-term results will be demonstrated by continued levels of patient engagement, decreased health system costs, and population health outcomes for all population segments.
Current Data Metrics Compared to Targeted Improvements
Effective technology-enabled transformation efforts need to have a thorough baseline assessment to measure the impact of the transformation. Across all clinical departments, 25% of patients use the patient portal, 60% of patients are satisfied with the portal, and 75% of patients attend e-appointments. Quality improvement efforts are likely to identify tremendous discrepancies between the actual performance and organizational objectives. In today’s healthcare landscape, data-driven decision-making is a must-have component of a healthcare management strategy. Research shows that most healthcare institutions have similar first-phase measures upon embarking on digital transformation. The intervention target is to fully implement digital portals to 85% satisfaction, and 95% of patients who are present for appointments using the portal. Digital measurement systems that are successful help to clarify progress and show value to stakeholders. The changes being implemented are significant and have been achieved through changes that are comparable with similar healthcare technology transformation initiatives and have been shown to achieve good results.
Key Performance Measures for Care Improvement
Robust digital measurement frameworks are critical to the success of healthcare technology interventions, and should measure performance in several domains, including clinical and operational improvements. The intervention will monitor four key indicators: patient engagement scores based on the amount of digital platform use, care coordination efficiency based on the time it takes for employees across the departments to respond to each other’s electronic inter-departmental communication. The remaining measures are about medication adherence and chronic disease management, and scores provided by individual Providers on the technological aspects of integration and streamlining of work. Digital interventions are always included in the basic measures categories, in the modern quality improvement programmes in health. Furthermore, the patient-reported outcome measures will provide enough data over the evaluation process, which will continue to improve the process over time. Effective digital measurement plans ensure digital interventions result in meaningful changes in patient care and clinical results.
Strategic Alignment with Organizational Goals
Informational technologies should support and contribute to the overall mission of the healthcare organization, to really get ROI and efficiency out of any technological intervention. The person-centred care intervention in the project is aligned strategically with two of the organisation’s holistic strategic plans to improve the delivery of healthcare and organisational performance. The first one is all about improving the patient journey and satisfaction through digital transformation projects that give patients control over it. The intervention directly tackles the organizational priority while addressing the desired intervention aspect of patient engagement metrics (.): by articulating the significant technology solutions (patient portal, telehealth services, mobile health, etc.). The second one is about achieving operational excellence and cost-saving from efficiency in the care coordination process and lesser usage of resources. Digital health technologies can also simplify administrative processes, reduce duplicate services and provider workflows, leading to cost savings and better performance measures. In addition, the technology-driven approach allows for data analytics and decision-making that is live and evidence-based, which can help meet both goals. The two goals reflect the value of the organization and provide for the long-term success of the implementation of the intervention.
Conclusion
PCC’s intervention is a holistic project of healthcare transformation, whose successful implementation relies on a multi-staged process featuring an evidence-based methodology and digital technologies. The strategic framework clearly reflects engagement with the organizational goals and provides measurable outcomes to the strategy that will lead towards sustainable change. By using proper planning, involving relevant stakeholders, and ongoing quality enhancement, this intervention will improve the patient experience and streamline operations. The evidence-based approach will ultimately provide actionable, clinically relevant results that will impact the patient, the provider, and the system at all levels.
References
Bhatt, P., Liu, J., Gong, Y., Wang, J., & Guo, Y. (2021). Emerging artificial intelligence-empowered mobile health: A scoping review (Preprint). Journal of Medical Internet Research MHealth and UHealth, 10(6), e35053. https://doi.org/10.2196/35053
Brenner, M., Weir, A., McCann, M., Doyle, C., Hughes, M., Moen, A., Ingvar, M., Nauwelaerts, K., Turk, E., & McCabe, C. (2023). Development of the key performance indicators for digital health interventions: A scoping review. Digital Health, 9. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076231152160
Chegini, Z., Zozani, M. A., Islam, S. M. S., Tobiano, G., & Rahimi, S. A. (2021). Barriers and facilitators to patient engagement in patient safety from patients and healthcare professionals’ perspectives: A systematic review and meta‐synthesis. Nursing Forum, 56(4), 938–949. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12635
Chen, Y., Laan, P. A. V., & Heher, Y. K. (2020). Using the model for improvement and plan-do-study-act to effect SMART change and advance quality. Cancer Cytopathology, 129(1), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncy.22319
Danforth, K., Ahmad, A. M., Blanchet, K., Khalid, M., Means, A. R., Memirie, S. T., Alwan, A., & Watkins, D. (2023). Monitoring and evaluating the implementation of essential packages of health services. BioMed Journal Global Health, 8(1), e010726. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010726
Huaytan, J. (2024). Digital transformation in public hospital management: Improving the patient experience – ProQuest. Proquest.com. https://search.proquest.com/openview/f76b8fddecd7a37b9deb6d76c200cd13/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2031968
Javeedullah, M. (2025). Using health informatics to streamline healthcare operations. American Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Computing, 1(1), 24–44. https://www.theamericanjournals.org/index.php/AJAC/article/view/2
Kraus, S., Schiavone, F., Pluzhnikova, A., & Invernizzi, A. C. (2021). Digital transformation in healthcare: Analyzing the current state-of-research. Journal of Business Research, 123(123), 557–567. sciencedirect. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.030
Kriegova, E., Kudelka, M., Radvansky, M., & Gallo, J. (2021). A theoretical model of health management using data-driven decision-making: The future of precision medicine and health. Journal of Translational Medicine, 19(1), e68. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-021-02714-8
Lee, T. J., Thomas, A. A., Grandhi, N. R., Galetta, M. S., Goyal, D. K. C., Fang, T., Schroeder, G. D., Kepler, C. K., & Vaccaro, A. R. (2020). Cost-effectiveness applications of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in spine surgery. Clinical Spine Surgery: A Spine Publication, 33(4), 140–145. https://doi.org/10.1097/bsd.0000000000000982
Lin, L., Sperrin, M., Jenkins, D. A., Martin, G. P., & Peek, N. (2021). A scoping review of causal methods enabling predictions under hypothetical interventions. Diagnostic and Prognostic Research, 5(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41512-021-00092-9
Lyles, C. R., Nelson, E. C., Frampton, S., Dykes, P. C., Cemballi, A. G., & Sarkar, U. (2020). Using electronic health record portals to improve patient engagement: Research priorities and best practices. Annals of Internal Medicine, 172(11), 123–129. https://doi.org/10.7326/m19-0876
Manandi, D., Tu, Q., Hafiz, N., Raeside, R., Redfern, J., & Hyun, K. (2023). The evaluation of the plan-do-study-act cycles for a healthcare quality improvement intervention in primary care. Australian Journal of Primary Health, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.1071/PY23123
Peláez, R. M., Brust, A. O., Rivera, S., Félix, V. G., Ostos, R., Brito, H., Félix, R. A., & Mena, L. J. (2023). Role of digital transformation for achieving sustainability: Mediated role of stakeholders, key capabilities, and technology. Sustainability, 15(14), e11221. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411221
Potthoff, S., Finch, T., Bührmann, L., Etzelmueller, A., Genugten, C. van , Girling, M., May, C., Perkins, N. J., Vis, C., & Rapley, T. (2023). Towards an implementation‐stakeholder engagement model (I‐STEM) for improving health and social care services. Health Expectations, 26(5), 1997–2012. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13808
Pyo, J., Lee, W., Choi, E. Y., Jang, S. G., & Ock, M. (2023). Qualitative research in healthcare: necessity and characteristics. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, 56(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.22.451
FAQs
Q1: What is the purpose of NURS FPX 8008 Assessment 3?
A: In NURS FPX 8008 Assessment 3, the students will assess the strategies to implement the person-centered collaborative care intervention, engagement of stakeholders, care coordination, and ways of improving patient outcomes based on evidence-based practice.
Q2: Why is person-centered care critical to the field of healthcare?
A: Person-centered care helps to increase patient satisfaction, promote shared decision-making, improve communication, and increase the effectiveness of care according to the needs and preferences of patients.
Q3: How does Assessment 3 align with organizational objectives?
A: Assessment 3 shows the importance of implementing collaborative care interventions to meet such organizational objectives as the improvement of the patient experience, quality of outcomes, care coordination, and efficiency of operations.