NURS FPX 6085 Assessment 3 Intervention Plan Design

NURS FPX 6085 Assessment 3 Intervention Plan Design

Capella University

NURS- FPX6085

Professor Name

NURS FPX 6085 Assessment 3 Intervention Plan Design

Healthcare intervention planning is a systematic approach that allows the clinician and/or healthcare leader to address a specific practice problem, in a streamlined and systematized way. It provides a place where concerns can be expressed, quantifiable objectives set and evidence-based strategies to improve practice in the high acuity units of women’s services can be identified in the context of new graduate nurses. In addition to this, an effective intervention plan should be in place ensuring that nurses receive regular support, guidance and skills to support their clinical practice during their initial practice (Klaic et al., 2022). This evaluation should be focused on the most critical components to design, implement, and measure an educational simulation activity that could be utilized to prepare new graduate nurses, based on the PICOT question.

Intervention Plan Components

Major Components

The main approach to their learning strategy is the use of high fidelity simulation, clinical skills testing, and a preceptor’s ongoing supervision and guidance to ensure clinical readiness (Tan et al., 2022). The interventions are evidence informed and target key confidence concerns, emergency situations and critical decision making – the top three areas that challenge new graduate nurses – and allow for practice within a safe learning environment, in complex maternal and neonatal scenarios. The intervention facilitates development of technical skills and training of clinical reasoning that will create safe patient care and reduce the anxiety in high acuity situations. Such a holistic approach to education is associated with improvement in performance, minimization of clinical errors, enhanced confidence and transition to independent practice as compared to the use of the traditional model of education only.

Criteria of Success

The effectiveness of this will be measured by the objective measures of the clinical preparedness, confidence and safe practice of nurses who have completed the structured simulation based orientation. This will include an improvement in the performance scores for simulations, preceptor scores and degree of self-reported confidence in the areas of routine and high-acuity situations for women’s services which are among the key indicators (Tan et al., 2022). Decreased number of near-miss, decreased clinical errors and improved clinical protocol compliance in the post-orientation stage will be some of the other markers for success. Other areas of success include continuing competency, continued use of simulation as a learner-centred approach, improved patient safety and the quality of care that lead to long term successful outcomes. The benefits of the successful implementation will also be recognised throughout the women’s services unit through more efficient use of clinical and educational resources and in reducing the sense of detachment and more importantly, the cost of any adverse event that occurs.

Cultural Needs and Characteristics of the Population

The target population for this project is new graduate nurses, due to their varied backgrounds across the three main areas (culture, education, and personal life) that may potentially impact on their approaches to learning, communication and confidence in making clinical decisions in a busy unit in a busy urban women’s services. All of these differences will require flexibility, inclusiveness and adjustment of the educational interventions to meet their previous exposure and familiarity with the health system. Culture sensitivity and respectful communication would need to be embedded in the teamwork simulation scenarios and in the orientation programmes, to reinforce teamwork and patient centred care (Ost et al., 2020). High evidence-based practice, inter-professional working and patient safety are part of the culture of the women’s services units which creates an environment conducive to the implementation of standardized and simulation training. Some challenges that affect consistency in training delivery however should be approached with care in change management approaches because of the hierarchical structure, differences in work experience of preceptors and resistance to change. Furthermore, the high stress, fast-paced environment in which the unit operates means that an orientation program needs to be well integrated and efficient, which can be an effective – albeit challenging – way to fit into the unit’s overall workflow, without disrupting the uniformity of the nursing unit and the interprofessional team in general.

Assumptions

Some of the challenges that come with this are making sure that there is enough staff to have a dedicated turn team at every shift, especially during night and weekend shifts; or having enough financial resources to run this. Staff reluctance to changing their workflows when bedside nurses might think the team is encroaching on patient care might impact on collaboration (Cheraghi et al., 2023). Planning patient repositioning schedules with other patient care activities, treatments and procedures can be logistically complex. In addition, in hemodynamically unstable patients, a different turning schedules might be necessary, and the turning schedules should be clearly communicated (Vyas et al., 2024).

Theoretical Foundations

Nursing Models

In this project, the nursing theory that has proven to be relevant is the Self-Care Deficit Theory proposed by Dorothea Orem and the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN) Synergy Model that are applicable in improving clinical preparation and safe nursing practices for new graduate nurses. This theory supports the design of nursing assistance in cases where patients are unable to take care of themselves completely, a direct link to the design nursing in cases of protection of maternal and neonatal patients in extreme cases.  The AACN Synergy Model emphasizes the connection between nurse competency to patient complexity and the need to focus on competency development of nurses through simulation education in women’s services units). Of all these, the Self-Care Deficit Theory of Orem is the most applicable to the design of the intervention and derives the nursing roles, accountability and evidence-based practice that will enhance the safety of patients during the transition to practice.

Strengths and Weaknesses

Yet, certain drawbacks of the theory in this context are its limitation of interprofessional co-operation which is essential in this area of service provision, where collaboration between the professions of nursing, doctors and service staff is essential. Moreover, the theory offers little guidance regarding how to negotiate and deal with the complexities of organizational design and rapidly changing clinical environments as are common in caring for women and neonates with complex needs and in transition-to-practice education interventions.

Other Disciplines

There are a number of approaches that can be adapted and integrated into this project that are of an interdisciplinary nature, such as Lean Management, Human Factors, and Evidence-based practices from the Aircraft industry used in patient safety and infection prevention in the context of Epidemiology. There are psychological approaches to encouraging behavioural change, models for implementing and evaluating quality improvement and there are systematic approaches that encourage interaction and compliance in novice nurses. For high acuity maternal and neonatal situations, interprofessional collaborative work within the healthcare team through effective communication is required to care for the mother and infant, and to ensure consistency. Lean management has the most noticeable impact on the intervention as it involves standardising practices, reducing variability of skills and it encourages constant improvement and continuously raises the level of competence, confidence and patient safety.

Strengths and Weaknesses

The benefits of applying the principles of Lean Management to the current project are that working strategies are organised and efficient, the number of steps that are not required for an orientation/training process could be reduced, and a picture is provided to verify the compliance with simulation/competencies in a training process. It also fosters a mindset of continuous improvement to sustain improved preparedness, confidence and patient safety of nurses. Restrictions, however, include the fact that complex decisions about patients’ care can be simplified, that staff may feel the care of patients is not the same in a process oriented environment, and that it may be challenging to use Lean in busy-paced, high stress units of women’s services. Furthermore, the demand for efficiency could potentially overlook individual, patient-centred aspects of care, essential in maternal and neonatal care.

Technologies

These technologies related to healthcare and relevant to this project include the use of electronic documentation when attending simulation, and clinical competence. It also offers high fidelity mannequins and simulation equipment to practice realistically, and automated feedback technologies which provides information for skill development and progress (Reza et al., 2020) Using digital reminders and mobile applications for compliance with orientation procedures, and real time monitoring of the performance to provide information on competence and confidence over time (Sreekumar et al., 2024). EHR systems greatly affect the design of interventions by facilitating intervention documentation, reminding healthcare providers to validate skills, offering the same assessment tools, and supporting excellent communication for efficient and high-quality training.

Strengths and Weaknesses

Electronic health records benefits of the adoption in this project are, first, it will be an automated data recording, second, will enable real-time orientation and simulation adherence monitoring and third, will create a standardised workflow, providing uniform training and high quality results in the skill development. Another advantage electronic health record (EHR) systems provide is a greater degree of accountability and communication among nurse educators, preceptors, and new graduate nurses. However, there are limitations such as alert fatigue, reliance on technology that may, in its failure, negatively impact training, cost of implementation and training, and may disrupt workflow when implementing. In addition, documentation and compliance may be put before improved clinical competency, confidence, and patient safety.

Justification

The theory, which has been clearly formulated by Orem is called Self-Care Deficit Theory, and this theory provides orientation and simulation-based guidelines by organizing the nursing activities in a manner, which enables the provision of safe care to the vulnerable and limited ability patients. The AACN synergy model associates the knowledge, abilities, and skills of professional nurses with the demands of encountering complex patient situations at the mother and neonate care levels, hoping to motivate the new graduate nurses in high-demand situations. Lean management can be applied to ensure a process has a high degree of consistency, a reduced amount of inefficiencies and a robust process that can be deployed to eliminate errors and promote safe patient care. Moreover, EHRs offer the capability to facilitate ongoing assessment and quality improvement of orientation activities, as well as to automatically document, monitor compliance, and gather real-time information. All of these nursing theories, interdisciplinary approaches, and healthcare technologies are all integrated into one, providing a robust foundation of training, patient safety, and accountability across all healthcare shifts and providers, in relation to design of evidence-based interventions.

Conflicting Evidence

However, there are some indications that the rigorous adherence to the standardized procedures may affect the individualized care, such as skills acquired by new graduate nurses to think critically and adjust to a complex situation of mother and newborn. Similarly, technologies like electronic health records can have both good and bad effects, and releases and disruptions to workflow can be frustrating, distracting and affect safe practice. While lean approaches are useful to streamline, they may not be completely suitable in the context of high acuity, changing environments, and flexibility – which is important in women’s services – where professional judgment has a role to play. The results produced evidence of a need for a balance between the need for standardisation and flexibility to facilitiate the development of trainings and clinical intervention programmes supporting patient safety and personal care.

Stakeholders, Regulations, and Government Bodies

The main stakeholders of this project are new graduate nurses who require a structured orientation and simulator training, and experienced Nurses who supervise clinical practice. It involves physicians working in the high acuity maternal and neonatal care, patients and families who anticipate high quality care at an affordable price, and hospital administrators. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) quality reporting and penalties as policy and regulatory incentives are attempting to provide an incentive to practice in the best way and to set patient safety goals. CMS will promote effective patient safety interventions through the patient safety standards which would help improve the quality of health care and harm reduction.

The policies applicable include the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) policies on infection prevention, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) policy in safe clinical settings and Joint Commission patient safety objectives that mandate competency validation, documentation of the competency and constant quality monitoring. Some of the primary assumptions are the stakeholders’ commitment to patient safety, the availability of institutional resources to support training and adherence to new evidence-based measures, and a lack of changes to regulatory priorities to ensure that they will be effective and meet accreditation requirements.

Ethical and Legal Issues

Ethical issues here involve informed consent to become involved in simulation-based learning, procedures and informed consent for patients regarding the interventions. In addition, they include taking care of beneficence by safe care taking practices and ensuring justice by providing fair training and care provision with different groups of patients (Arellano et al., 2023). These ethical issues have an impact on nursing practice as they create a necessity to provide an in-depth discussion of the aims and advantages of orientation programmes. It also helps in promoting the shared decision making process and by introducing the cultural sensitivity into the simulation and clinical practices. Legal factors include the responsibility for patient safety quality, regulatory requirements, documentation for quality reporting requirements and evidence-based practice (EBP) liability safeguard (Young and Smith, 2022). These state regulations help to inform the intervention design in varied ways depending on the need for: Structured competency assessment – to ensure that the intervention fulfills the intent of the regulation; Comprehensive record keeping – to ensure that the intervention meets the intent of the regulation; and Monitoring – ensures the intervention is compliant, of patient’s best interests, and under the control of the regulatory body.

Areas of Uncertainty

There are times when the proposed interventions are not aligned with patient preferences, such as if patients do not want to participate in evidence-based treatments, which can present an ethical conundrum between patient autonomy and safety. Legal issues revolve around whom an interdisciplinary team is responsible for, their accountability when things go wrong – irrespective of whether they follow formal procedures correctly or not – in the simulation-based or clinical practice (Young and Smith, 2022). Other challenges include; making sure that patients’ needs are met while working with standard training and care processes and roles of various healthcare workers who will be involved in making decisions during complex clinical situations. These issues highlight the need for clarity, communication and systematic oversight of the delivery of patient safety and accountability of the professional.

Conclusion

Evidence-based practice is a difficult concept to apply as illustrated in structured intervention plans such as orientation programs for new graduate nurses for the women’s services, done through simulation. They are Nursing programs that integrate to include nursing theories, inter-disciplinary collaboration and a high-tech teaching approach to ensure that effective skills are learned and patient care is delivered. Success lies with the active stakeholders, institutional support and regular assessment of the standardised training to suit each nurse and patient. While these frameworks have some challenges, uncertainties and conflicting evidence, they are a very good foundation to build nursing competence and patient safety outcomes..

References For NURS FPX 6085 Assessment 3

Arellano, L., Alcubilla, P., & Leguízamo, L. (2023). Ethical considerations in informed consent. Ethics – Scientific Research, Ethical Issues, Artificial Intelligence, and Education. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1001319

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2024, April 3). Standard precautions for all patient care. CDC.gov. https://www.cdc.gov/infection-control/hcp/basics/standard-precautions.html

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (2025). Patient safety | CMS. Cms.gov. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/QualityInitiativesGenInfo/ACA-MQI/Patient-Safety/MQI-Patient-Safety

Hilton, C. (2023). Behaviour change, the itchy spot of healthcare quality improvement: How can psychology theory and skills help to scratch the itch? Health Psychology Open, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20551029231198938

Khademian, Z., Ara, F. K., & Gholamzadeh, S. (2020). The effect of self-care education based on Orem’s nursing theory on quality of life and self-efficacy in patients with hypertension: A quasi-experimental study. International Journal of Community Based Nursing & Midwifery, 8(2), 140–149. https://doi.org/10.30476/IJCBNM.2020.81690.0

Klaic, M., Kapp, S., Hudson, P., Chapman, W., Denehy, L., Story, D., & Francis, J. J. (2022). Implementability of healthcare interventions: An overview of reviews and development of a conceptual framework. Implementation Science, 17(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01171-7

Mahmoud, Z., Halgand, N. A., Churruca, K., Ellis, L. A., & Braithwaite, J. (2021). The impact of lean management on frontline healthcare professionals: A scoping review of the literature. BioMed Central Health Services Research, 21(1), 383. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06344-0

Ost, K., Blalock, C., Fagan, M., Sweeney, K. M., & Hoover, S. R. M. (2020). Aligning organizational culture and infrastructure to support evidence-based practice. Critical Care Nurse, 40(3), 59–63. https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2020963 

Pak, B. (2025, March 25). Partnering for success: How AACN bridges the nurse readiness gap with competency-based assessment. Aacn.org; American Association of Critical-Care Nurses. https://solutions.aacn.org/blog/strengthening-patient-provider-relationships-through-aacn-membership-0

Reza, F., Prieto, J. T., & Julien, S. P. (2020). Electronic health records: Origination, adoption, and progression. Health Informatics, 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41215-9_11

Sinha, R. (2024). The role and impact of new technologies on healthcare systems. Discover Health Systems, 3(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44250-024-00163-w

Sreekumar, K., Reddy, T. P., & Prathap, B. R. (2024). Enhancing patient safety and efficiency in intravenous therapy. Internet of Things in Bioelectronics, 171–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394241903.ch9

Tan, K.-A. Z. Y., Seah, B., Wong, L. F., Lee, C. C. S., Goh, H. S., & Liaw, S. Y. (2022). Simulation-based mastery learning to facilitate transition to nursing practice. Nurse Educator, 47(6), 336–341. https://doi.org/10.1097/nne.0000000000001224

Young, M., & Smith, M. (2022). Standards and evaluation of healthcare quality, safety, and person-centered care. PubMed; StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK576432/

FAQs – NURS FPX 6085 Assessment 3

Q1. What is the purpose of the NURS FPX 6085 Assessment 3 Intervention Plan Design?

The purpose is to design an intervention plan based on a healthcare problem that can be found out after doing an evidence-based literature review and clinical analysis.

Q2. What are the elements that should be contained in an intervention plan?

The elements that should be contained in the intervention plan include the problem itself, the intended intervention, how it will be implemented, stakeholders, outcomes, and evaluation process.

Q3. What role does evidence-based practice play in designing an intervention plan?

Evidence-based practice ensures that the proposed intervention is supported by credible research, improving patient outcomes and healthcare quality.

Scroll to Top